02. Teaching
Survey of Ancient through Medieval Art
The University of Texas at Austin
Department of Art and Art HistorySpring 2026
TTH 5-6:30 am
Deep in the Sahara desert, caves and tucked-away rock shelters still preserve outstanding paintings and carvings from 7,000 years ago that capture, with extraordinary precision, people in moments of daily life. We see women carrying water from its source, buckets delicately balanced on their shoulders, herders with their cattle, and children skipping ropes and running in jubilant play. In some caves, we discover the giant animals that once roamed the desert when it was fertile grassland—stout rhinos and elegant giraffes populate these scenes. Then there is text, appearing a few thousand years ago, telling us where the Indigenous people of this land come from, where they are headed, and where and with whom they belong. Millennia later, in the 1960s, modern artists in the region turned to these caves to glean lessons in art and marshal them within their expressions of modernity. They believed these ancient painters held the answers to rebuilding their art and culture after centuries of colonial degradation and marginalization.
We will do something similar in this course. We will examine diverse cultures around the world across a vast timeline, moving roughly chronologically, but always listening for what lessons they hold for us today. These periods in art, from prehistoric times to what is erroneously known as the Dark Ages, that is, the Medieval era, often connect directly to modern questions or anxieties about tradition and how modernity positioned itself at times against and at others in tandem with these traditions. The cyclical recurrence of the ancient in modern times challenges our linear perception of advancement and progress. It aids us in reorienting the histories of art as recursive and asynchronous, where influences flow in and out across space (through global exchanges, as we will learn) and time (with the resurgence of the ancestral past in today’s art).
Theories of Vision and VisualityTBD
TBD
Anyone who has walked through the Impressionist galleries at the Musée d’Orsay in Paris or attempted to get a closer look at Manet’s iconic painting Olympia (1863) has likely struggled to push their way through the throngs of visitors, many pausing to take multiple selfies in front of famous artworks from Western art history. Similarly, one would consider themselves lucky to get within ten feet of the Mona Lisa at the Louvre. This course is about looking and learning to look. The question “How do I look?” has several working parts, from your outward appearance and self-presentation to how you make sense of what you see and your relationship with the very act of looking. These considerations now seem a necessity for navigating our social and cultural identity positions in our image-saturated times. In this course, we will learn the art of analyzing and decoding images and connecting them to broader social and cultural phenomena.
Additionally, this course propounds that looking is more than just seeing; it is a discipline of sorts, one that necessitates a considerable engagement with representations, symbols, icons, and images. Whether in the setting of protest movements, propaganda, art practices, or regular media consumption, we will learn how the politics of looking have influenced historical and present-day practices of image-making. We will examine the valency between images, power, and politics and the ways in which visual culture shapes our world while being shaped by it in return. We will explore influential theories from the past century and a half, not least from Semiotics to Institutional Critique, Modernism, Postmodernism, and Simulation. Through discussions and case studies, we will unpack the polyvalent character of visual representation and its impact on our understanding of the world.
Syllabus available upon request.
Survey of Renaissance through Modern Art: A Feminist History
The University of Texas at Austin
Department of Art and Art History
Fall 2025
TTH 8-9:30 am
Art history is far from a discipline without gender bias. In 1950, when E. H. Gombrich’s “bible” for introductory art history,
The Story of Art, was published, it did not include any women artists (Hessel, 2023). In fact, the sixteenth edition, released in 1995, had only one. More than half a century has passed since the publication of Linda Nochlin’s landmark essay “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” in which Nochlin questioned the prevailing narrative. In 2011, the Guerrilla Girls, a group of anonymous artists based in the United States, issued a poster that indicated a significant gender gap at the Metropolitan Museum of Art: Only 4% of the artists shown in the Modern Art sections were women, while 76% of the works featured female nudes. According to a 2019 study brought to light by
The Guardian, which examined the collections of the eighteen most prominent U.S. art museums, there still remains a notable disparity: 87% of the artworks are credited to male artists and 85% to white artists. This startling inequality reflects not a dearth of “great” women artists but their systematic erasure from the documents of art history.
This course moves beyond simply “discovering” overlooked women artists and addresses the fundamental questions raised by feminist art historians like Nochlin and Griselda Pollock. Rather than merely inserting women into the existing canon dating back to Giorgio Vasari’s monographic model, we will critically examine works by women artists from the Medieval period onward while questioning the value systems that determine artistic importance. We will discuss the ways in which women artists’ works have been cast as marginal, often because of societal norms that looked unkindly upon their gender. By surveying a wide range of artistic practices, styles, and approaches and developing analytical skills through feminist theoretical frameworks, students will discover that a history of art centered on women’s contributions constitutes a body of knowledge that is as unabridged and intellectually rigorous as the tacitly male-centric art history as we know it today.
Syllabus available upon request.